• OpenAccess
    • List of Articles Ibn Sina

      • Open Access Article

        1 - Anthropology from the perspective ibn sina
        masome alvandiyan Ali alah behdashti
        Human thinking has a long history of human life. One of the main human issues from the very beginning was the question of itself and the surrounding environment. Religious scholars and religious theologians have made many theories about different aspects of human life i More
        Human thinking has a long history of human life. One of the main human issues from the very beginning was the question of itself and the surrounding environment. Religious scholars and religious theologians have made many theories about different aspects of human life in different periods, from all over the world. Among these would be Ibn-e Sina, whose philosophical opinions had a tremendous impact on other scholars. This research is based on descriptive-analytic method, with the study of the topics of Sheikh Al-Rais in the sciences, in his philosophic books such as healing, salvation, hints and punishments in the fields of humanities, to explain his thoughts on human life. He examines humanity in two stages and two stages: the first stage is pure philosophical and theoretical, In which he looks at the human being and his existential dimensions with a rational and philosophical view; the second stage, which is the culmination of his anthropology, is the stage of enlightenment and intuition. In his mystical rhetoric, such as Haye Ibn Yaghazan, Al-Tha'ir, Salam and Abbasal, and in the final sentences of hints and punishments and lines from the book of discussions and the book of healing, with an illogical and mystical view, he has discussed the human. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        2 - Critical analysis of Sadr al-Mutalahin's view on bodily resurrection
        Hossein movahedpoor Seyyed Hashem  Golestani Mohammad Reza  Shamshiri
        The collective view of Islamic philosophers is that reason is unable to prove physical resurrection and the reasons for proving physical resurrection are merely narrative. Considering that the main truth of man is in the soul and understanding is also achieved by the so More
        The collective view of Islamic philosophers is that reason is unable to prove physical resurrection and the reasons for proving physical resurrection are merely narrative. Considering that the main truth of man is in the soul and understanding is also achieved by the soul, and in the meantime, the soul uses matter only as a tool and a means to achieve its desires.In this article ،an attempt is made to first present a brief picture of the appearance of elemental doubts and the non-physicality of resurrection among Islamic philosophers، and then to discuss the foundations of resurrection in the wisdom of the Supreme.Attention should be paid to this matter، how can the main problems and doubts raised by Sadr al-Mutealehin be resolved and what answer can be found for it. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        3 - Critical confrontations between Sinavi philosophy and Ash'ari philosophy in psychology and its effect on the issue of resurrection
        Narjes  Roudgar Zahra  Ziaie Fatemeh  Sharif Fakhr
        The purpose of this research is to examine the critical confrontations between Sinavi philosophy and Ash'ari philosophy in psychology and its effect on the position of each on the issue of resurrection. In order to defend the doctrine of incarnation, the Ash'ari theolog More
        The purpose of this research is to examine the critical confrontations between Sinavi philosophy and Ash'ari philosophy in psychology and its effect on the position of each on the issue of resurrection. In order to defend the doctrine of incarnation, the Ash'ari theologians established their theological eschatology by adopting the approach of physicality of the soul and matching it with the teachings of revelation. Ash'ari's view was criticized by Ibn Sina. Ibn Sina, by formulating a new nature of the science of soul in theology and natural sciences, achieved a new result in the unprovability of metaphysical rationality and the rational proof of metaspirituality. The present study, with descriptive and analytical method, in addition to reflecting the views of each, has dealt with Ibn Sina's critical encounter with Ash'ari in psychology and eschatology. Ibn Sina opened new horizons in philosophy by creating a logical relationship between intellectual achievements and the appearances of the holy Sharia.Acceptance of physical resurrection included in Sharia and proof of pure spiritual resurrection are among these cases. With the aim of harmonizing the theological foundations and the appearances of the Sharia, Ash'areh also took a similar path with Ibn Sina, which led to the proof of the resurrection. Finally, as a result of the theoretical frictions between Ash'ari and Ibn Sina, their different views on resurrection have been formed. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        4 - Comparison of the opinions of Ibn Sina and Ibn Arabi on the issue of free will and destiny
        Somayeh Heiran Abbas  Ahmadi Saiedi mohamad ali akhgar
        In this research, the issue of free will in humans and divine destiny in the views of Ibn Sina and Ibn Arabi are examined and then compared. The importance of the research is due to the distinction between Ibn Sina's philosophical approach and Ibn Arabi's mystical-theol More
        In this research, the issue of free will in humans and divine destiny in the views of Ibn Sina and Ibn Arabi are examined and then compared. The importance of the research is due to the distinction between Ibn Sina's philosophical approach and Ibn Arabi's mystical-theological approach to answer the question of free will in man and divine destiny, while both thinkers have the same procedure in explaining the issue of Qada, Qadr and free will in the philosophical discussion or There are mystics of unity. The most important similarity between the views of these two thinkers is in considering the will in humans as non-inherent, which they see in the light of God's innate will. The most important difference between Ibn Arabi's and Ibn Sina's opinions regarding divine judgment and destiny is Ibn Sina's reliance and emphasis on the knowledge of God's mercy and Ibn Arabi's emphasis on divine judgment. This difference is rooted in Ibn Sina's philosophical approach and Ibn Arabi's mystical-theological approach to analyze the subject. Regarding free will in man, Ibn Sina believes that by performing certain actions, a person has the ability to exercise his opinion and change his destiny, and God has decreed such that there is certainty and certainty in man's actions, and that judgment is based on his free will and will. And the divine decree has determined the free will in the actions of humans. According to Ibn Arabi, the judgment and fate of God's decree is in the order of fixed nobles and their requirements, and therefore the will and free will of man are also in their domain. And Qada and Qadr do not violate human free will. The method of this research is based on descriptive-analytical and using library texts. Manuscript profile